2010-11 BIG EAST Women's Basketball

SCORING OFFENSE		G	W-L	Pts	Avg/G
1.	Connecticut	16	16-0	1196	74.8
2.	Notre Dame	16	13-3	1168	73.0
3.	DePaul	16	13-3	1103	68.9
4.	Louisville	16	10-6	1032	64.5
5.	Syracuse	16	9-7	1003	62.7
6.	Marquette	16	10-6	998	62.4
7.	Georgetown	16	9-7	987	61.7
8.	West Virginia	16	8-8	982	61.4
9.	St. John's	16	9-7	979	61.2
10.	Pittsburgh	16	5-11	971	60.7
11.	Rutgers	16	11-5	942	58.9
12.	USF	16	3-13	912	57.0
13.	Seton Hall	16	1-15	829	51.8
14.	Providence	16	6-10	813	50.8
15.	Villanova	16	3-13	786	49.1
16.	Cincinnati	16	2-14	743	46.4

 

SCORING DEFENSE		G	Pts	Avg/G
1.	Connecticut	16	815	50.9
2.	Rutgers	16	848	53.0
3.	Notre Dame	16	883	55.2
4.	Georgetown	16	931	58.2
5.	DePaul	16	933	58.3
6.	West Virginia	16	937	58.6
	Villanova	16	937	58.6
8.	Louisville	16	953	59.6
9.	Providence	16	958	59.9
10.	St. John's	16	983	61.4
11.	Syracuse	16	1003	62.7
12.	Marquette	16	1013	63.3
13.	Cincinnati	16	1043	65.2
14.	Pittsburgh	16	1056	66.0
15.	Seton Hall	16	1068	66.8
16.	USF	16	1083	67.7

 

SCORING MARGIN		G	Offense	Defense	Margin
1.	Connecticut	16	74.8	50.9	+23.8
2.	Notre Dame	16	73.0	55.2	+17.8
3.	DePaul	16	68.9	58.3	+10.6
4.	Rutgers	16	58.9	53.0	+5.9
5.	Louisville	16	64.5	59.6	+4.9
6.	Georgetown	16	61.7	58.2	+3.5
7.	West Virginia	16	61.4	58.6	+2.8
8.	Syracuse	16	62.7	62.7	+0.0
9.	St. John's	16	61.2	61.4	-0.2
10.	Marquette	16	62.4	63.3	-0.9
11.	Pittsburgh	16	60.7	66.0	-5.3
12.	Providence	16	50.8	59.9	-9.1
13.	Villanova	16	49.1	58.6	-9.4
14.	USF	16	57.0	67.7	-10.7
15.	Seton Hall	16	51.8	66.8	-14.9
16.	Cincinnati	16	46.4	65.2	-18.8

 

FREE THROW PCT		G	FTM	FTA	Pct
1.	Villanova	16	104	131	.794
2.	Connecticut	16	224	297	.754
3.	Marquette	16	236	313	.754
4.	Louisville	16	188	262	.718
5.	Pittsburgh	16	221	310	.713
6.	West Virginia	16	236	334	.707
7.	Syracuse	16	258	369	.699
8.	Notre Dame	16	279	400	.698
9.	St. John's	16	203	297	.684
10.	Seton Hall	16	179	263	.681
11.	Rutgers	16	192	283	.678
12.	DePaul	16	150	226	.664
13.	Georgetown	16	161	246	.654
14.	USF	16	170	263	.646
15.	Providence	16	124	195	.636
16.	Cincinnati	16	122	201	.607

 

FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGES		G	FGM	FGA	Pct
1.	Connecticut	16	438	864	.507
2.	Notre Dame	16	418	890	.470
3.	St. John's	16	364	844	.431
4.	DePaul	16	419	972	.431
5.	Louisville	16	368	863	.426
6.	Rutgers	16	341	809	.422
7.	West Virginia	16	343	853	.402
8.	Marquette	16	339	849	.399
9.	Georgetown	16	358	919	.390
10.	Pittsburgh	16	335	873	.384
11.	Syracuse	16	336	879	.382
12.	Villanova	16	283	792	.357
13.	USF	16	337	945	.357
14.	Providence	16	314	893	.352
15.	Cincinnati	16	260	782	.332
16.	Seton Hall	16	285	877	.325

 

FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE		G	FGM	FGA	Pct
1.	Connecticut	16	300	923	.325
2.	Rutgers	16	296	845	.350
3.	Notre Dame	16	318	848	.375
4.	West Virginia	16	315	828	.380
5.	Pittsburgh	16	369	951	.388
6.	Syracuse	16	355	910	.390
7.	Georgetown	16	305	781	.391
8.	DePaul	16	335	844	.397
9.	St. John's	16	373	927	.402
10.	Louisville	16	343	838	.409
11.	Marquette	16	383	928	.413
12.	Providence	16	344	818	.421
13.	Villanova	16	352	833	.423
14.	Cincinnati	16	392	921	.426
15.	Seton Hall	16	389	878	.443
16.	USF	16	369	831	.444

 

3-POINT FG PCT		G	3FGM	3FGA	Pct
1.	Connecticut	16	96	242	.397
2.	Notre Dame	16	53	137	.387
3.	DePaul	16	115	325	.354
4.	St. John's	16	48	137	.350
5.	Louisville	16	108	313	.345
6.	Rutgers	16	68	199	.342
7.	Marquette	16	84	256	.328
8.	Seton Hall	16	80	247	.324
9.	Georgetown	16	110	348	.316
10.	Cincinnati	16	101	324	.312
11.	USF	16	68	225	.302
12.	Pittsburgh	16	80	270	.296
13.	West Virginia	16	60	204	.294
14.	Syracuse	16	73	257	.284
15.	Villanova	16	116	412	.282
16.	Providence	16	61	222	.275

 

3-POINT FG PCT DEFENSE		G	3FGM	3FGA	Pct
1.	Providence	16	57	207	.275
2.	DePaul	16	65	232	.280
3.	Connecticut	16	87	300	.290
4.	Louisville	16	83	284	.292
5.	Notre Dame	16	65	213	.305
6.	Pittsburgh	16	81	264	.307
7.	Georgetown	16	92	299	.308
8.	USF	16	76	234	.325
9.	Rutgers	16	97	297	.327
10.	St. John's	16	89	271	.328
11.	Seton Hall	16	87	262	.332
12.	Marquette	16	100	295	.339
13.	Villanova	16	58	170	.341
14.	West Virginia	16	72	206	.350
15.	Syracuse	16	109	302	.361
16.	Cincinnati	16	103	282	.365

 

REBOUNDING OFFENSE		G	Rebounds	Avg/G
1.	Syracuse	16	657	41.1
2.	Connecticut	16	644	40.2
3.	Notre Dame	16	628	39.2
4.	Pittsburgh	16	598	37.4
5.	DePaul	16	583	36.4
6.	West Virginia	16	582	36.4
7.	USF	16	575	35.9
8.	Georgetown	16	569	35.6
9.	Rutgers	16	565	35.3
10.	Marquette	16	563	35.2
11.	Providence	16	549	34.3
12.	Seton Hall	16	523	32.7
13.	St. John's	16	522	32.6
14.	Louisville	16	505	31.6
15.	Cincinnati	16	503	31.4
16.	Villanova	16	437	27.3

 

REBOUNDING DEFENSE		G	Rebounds	Avg/G
1.	Connecticut	16	466	29.1
2.	Notre Dame	16	500	31.3
3.	Rutgers	16	526	32.9
4.	West Virginia	16	535	33.4
5.	Syracuse	16	538	33.6
6.	Marquette	16	546	34.1
7.	Louisville	16	557	34.8
8.	Georgetown	16	567	35.4
9.	DePaul	16	568	35.5
10.	Providence	16	583	36.4
11.	St. John's	16	590	36.9
12.	Cincinnati	16	592	37.0
13.	Villanova	16	600	37.5
14.	USF	16	605	37.8
15.	Pittsburgh	16	611	38.2
16.	Seton Hall	16	619	38.7

 

REBOUNDING MARGIN		G	Team	Avg.	Opponent	Avg.	Margin
1.	Connecticut	16	644	40.2	466	29.1	+11.1
2.	Notre Dame	16	628	39.2	500	31.3	+8.0
3.	Syracuse	16	657	41.1	538	33.6	+7.4
4.	West Virginia	16	582	36.4	535	33.4	+2.9
5.	Rutgers	16	565	35.3	526	32.9	+2.4
6.	Marquette	16	563	35.2	546	34.1	+1.1
7.	DePaul	16	583	36.4	568	35.5	+0.9
8.	Georgetown	16	569	35.6	567	35.4	+0.1
9.	Pittsburgh	16	598	37.4	611	38.2	-0.8
10.	USF	16	575	35.9	605	37.8	-1.9
11.	Providence	16	549	34.3	583	36.4	-2.1
12.	Louisville	16	505	31.6	557	34.8	-3.2
13.	St. John's	16	522	32.6	590	36.9	-4.2
14.	Cincinnati	16	503	31.4	592	37.0	-5.6
15.	Seton Hall	16	523	32.7	619	38.7	-6.0
16.	Villanova	16	437	27.3	600	37.5	-10.2

 

BLOCKED SHOTS		G	No.	Avg/G
1.	Pittsburgh	16	81	5.1
	West Virginia	16	81	5.1
3.	Rutgers	16	72	4.5
4.	Connecticut	16	67	4.2
5.	Notre Dame	16	65	4.1
6.	Syracuse	16	63	3.9
7.	DePaul	16	59	3.7
8.	USF	16	55	3.4
9.	St. John's	16	54	3.4
10.	Providence	16	53	3.3
11.	Louisville	16	45	2.8
12.	Georgetown	16	41	2.6
13.	Villanova	16	38	2.4
14.	Marquette	16	37	2.3
15.	Seton Hall	16	30	1.9
16.	Cincinnati	16	27	1.7

 

ASSISTS		G	No.	Avg/G
1.	Connecticut	16	297	18.6
2.	DePaul	16	275	17.2
3.	Notre Dame	16	255	15.9
4.	Marquette	16	237	14.8
	Georgetown	16	237	14.8
6.	Louisville	16	215	13.4
7.	Pittsburgh	16	205	12.8
8.	Rutgers	16	200	12.5
9.	Villanova	16	199	12.4
10.	St. John's	16	194	12.1
11.	Syracuse	16	186	11.6
12.	USF	16	181	11.3
13.	West Virginia	16	179	11.2
14.	Providence	16	177	11.1
15.	Cincinnati	16	167	10.4
16.	Seton Hall	16	155	9.7

 

STEALS		G	No.	Avg/G
1.	Notre Dame	16	188	11.8
2.	Georgetown	16	164	10.3
3.	DePaul	16	157	9.8
4.	Louisville	16	154	9.6
5.	West Virginia	16	145	9.1
6.	St. John's	16	128	8.0
7.	Connecticut	16	123	7.7
	Rutgers	16	123	7.7
9.	Marquette	16	121	7.6
10.	Syracuse	16	116	7.3
11.	USF	16	115	7.2
12.	Providence	16	113	7.1
13.	Seton Hall	16	110	6.9
14.	Villanova	16	97	6.1
15.	Cincinnati	16	87	5.4
16.	Pittsburgh	16	75	4.7

 

TURNOVER MARGIN		G	Team	Avg.	Opponent	Avg.	Margin
1.	Notre Dame	16	285	17.8	351	21.9	+4.12
2.	DePaul	16	237	14.8	300	18.8	+3.94
3.	Georgetown	16	268	16.8	328	20.5	+3.75
4.	Louisville	16	286	17.9	337	21.1	+3.19
5.	St. John's	16	261	16.3	281	17.6	+1.25
6.	USF	16	233	14.6	235	14.7	+0.12
7.	West Virginia	16	295	18.4	295	18.4	+0.00
8.	Connecticut	16	252	15.8	251	15.7	-0.06
9.	Providence	16	275	17.2	273	17.1	-0.12
10.	Rutgers	16	256	16.0	253	15.8	-0.19
11.	Seton Hall	16	285	17.8	271	16.9	-0.88
12.	Villanova	16	230	14.4	214	13.4	-1.00
13.	Marquette	16	274	17.1	251	15.7	-1.44
14.	Syracuse	16	307	19.2	261	16.3	-2.88
15.	Pittsburgh	16	281	17.6	215	13.4	-4.13
16.	Cincinnati	16	288	18.0	197	12.3	-5.69

 

ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO		G	Assist	Avg.	T-Over	Avg.	Ratio
1.	Connecticut	16	297	18.6	252	15.8	1.2
2.	DePaul	16	275	17.2	237	14.8	1.2
3.	Notre Dame	16	255	15.9	285	17.8	0.9
4.	Georgetown	16	237	14.8	268	16.8	0.9
5.	Villanova	16	199	12.4	230	14.4	0.9
6.	Marquette	16	237	14.8	274	17.1	0.9
7.	Rutgers	16	200	12.5	256	16.0	0.8
8.	USF	16	181	11.3	233	14.6	0.8
9.	Louisville	16	215	13.4	286	17.9	0.8
10.	St. John's	16	194	12.1	261	16.3	0.7
11.	Pittsburgh	16	205	12.8	281	17.6	0.7
12.	Providence	16	177	11.1	275	17.2	0.6
13.	West Virginia	16	179	11.2	295	18.4	0.6
14.	Syracuse	16	186	11.6	307	19.2	0.6
15.	Cincinnati	16	167	10.4	288	18.0	0.6
16.	Seton Hall	16	155	9.7	285	17.8	0.5

 

OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS		G	No.	Avg/G
1.	Syracuse	16	263	16.4
2.	USF	16	247	15.4
3.	Notre Dame	16	233	14.6
4.	Georgetown	16	230	14.4
5.	DePaul	16	226	14.1
6.	Seton Hall	16	219	13.7
7.	West Virginia	16	217	13.6
8.	Pittsburgh	16	207	12.9
	Providence	16	207	12.9
10.	Marquette	16	199	12.4
11.	Cincinnati	16	185	11.6
12.	Connecticut	16	181	11.3
13.	Rutgers	16	179	11.2
14.	St. John's	16	173	10.8
15.	Louisville	16	169	10.6
16.	Villanova	16	102	6.4

 

DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS		G	No.	Avg/G
1.	Connecticut	16	463	28.9
2.	Notre Dame	16	395	24.7
3.	Syracuse	16	394	24.6
4.	Pittsburgh	16	391	24.4
5.	Rutgers	16	386	24.1
6.	West Virginia	16	365	22.8
7.	Marquette	16	364	22.8
8.	DePaul	16	357	22.3
9.	St. John's	16	349	21.8
10.	Providence	16	342	21.4
11.	Georgetown	16	339	21.2
12.	Louisville	16	336	21.0
13.	Villanova	16	335	20.9
14.	USF	16	328	20.5
15.	Cincinnati	16	318	19.9
16.	Seton Hall	16	304	19.0

 

DEFENSIVE REB PCT.		G	Team D-Reb	Opp. O-REb	D-Reb Pct.
1.	Connecticut	16	463	182	.718
2.	Notre Dame	16	395	198	.666
3.	Rutgers	16	386	200	.659
4.	Syracuse	16	394	206	.657
5.	Providence	16	342	180	.655
6.	West Virginia	16	365	194	.653
7.	Marquette	16	364	198	.648
8.	Villanova	16	335	184	.645
9.	Georgetown	16	339	190	.641
10.	DePaul	16	357	201	.640
11.	USF	16	328	192	.631
12.	Louisville	16	336	203	.623
13.	Pittsburgh	16	391	238	.622
14.	St. John's	16	349	233	.600
15.	Cincinnati	16	318	220	.591
16.	Seton Hall	16	304	218	.582

 

OFFENSIVE REB PCT.		G	Team O-Reb	Opp. D-Reb	O-Reb Pct.
1.	Syracuse	16	263	332	.442
2.	Notre Dame	16	233	302	.436
3.	Connecticut	16	181	284	.389
4.	West Virginia	16	217	341	.389
5.	DePaul	16	226	367	.381
6.	Georgetown	16	230	377	.379
7.	USF	16	247	413	.374
8.	Marquette	16	199	348	.364
9.	Pittsburgh	16	207	373	.357
10.	Rutgers	16	179	326	.354
11.	Seton Hall	16	219	401	.353
12.	Providence	16	207	403	.339
13.	Cincinnati	16	185	372	.332
14.	St. John's	16	173	357	.326
15.	Louisville	16	169	354	.323
16.	Villanova	16	102	416	.197

 

3-POINT FG MADE		G	No.	Avg/G
1.	Villanova	16	116	7.3
2.	DePaul	16	115	7.2
3.	Georgetown	16	110	6.9
4.	Louisville	16	108	6.8
5.	Cincinnati	16	101	6.3
6.	Connecticut	16	96	6.0
7.	Marquette	16	84	5.3
8.	Seton Hall	16	80	5.0
	Pittsburgh	16	80	5.0
10.	Syracuse	16	73	4.6
11.	USF	16	68	4.3
	Rutgers	16	68	4.3
13.	Providence	16	61	3.8
14.	West Virginia	16	60	3.8
15.	Notre Dame	16	53	3.3
16.	St. John's	16	48	3.0

 

Standings	Conference	Pct.	PF	PA		Overall	Pct.	PF	PA		Home	Away	Neutral	Last 10	Streak
Connecticut	16-0	1.000	74.8	50.9		16-0	1.000	74.8	50.9
Notre Dame	13-3	.813	73.0	55.2		13-3	.813	73.0	55.2
DePaul	13-3	.813	68.9	58.3		13-3	.813	68.9	58.3
Rutgers	11-5	.688	58.9	53.0		11-5	.688	58.9	53.0
Louisville	10-6	.625	64.5	59.6		10-6	.625	64.5	59.6
Marquette	10-6	.625	62.4	63.3		10-6	.625	62.4	63.3
Syracuse	9-7	.563	62.7	62.7		9-7	.563	62.7	62.7
Georgetown	9-7	.563	61.7	58.2		9-7	.563	61.7	58.2
St. John's	9-7	.563	61.2	61.4		9-7	.563	61.2	61.4
West Virginia	8-8	.500	61.4	58.6		8-8	.500	61.4	58.6
Providence	6-10	.375	50.8	59.9		6-10	.375	50.8	59.9
Pittsburgh	5-11	.313	60.7	66.0		5-11	.313	60.7	66.0
USF	3-13	.188	57.0	67.7		3-13	.188	57.0	67.7
Villanova	3-13	.188	49.1	58.6		3-13	.188	49.1	58.6
Cincinnati	2-14	.125	46.4	65.2		2-14	.125	46.4	65.2
Seton Hall	1-15	.063	51.8	66.8		1-15	.063	51.8	66.8

 

Winning streak	No.
Connecticut	16
Rutgers	4
USF	2
West Virginia	1
Providence	1
Villanova	1
DePaul	1
Cincinnati	1

 

TEAM SUMMARIES	G	PF-PA	Avg score	Margin	FG-FGA	Pct.	3FG-FGA	Pct.	FT-FTA	Pct.	RebF	RebA	Margin
Cincinnati	16	743-1043	46.4-65.2	-18.7	260-782	.332	101-324	.312	122-201	.607	503	592	-5.6
Connecticut	16	1196-815	74.8-50.9	+23.8	438-864	.507	96-242	.397	224-297	.754	644	466	+11.1
DePaul	16	1103-933	68.9-58.3	+10.6	419-972	.431	115-325	.354	150-226	.664	583	568	+0.9
Georgetown	16	987-931	61.7-58.2	+3.5	358-919	.390	110-348	.316	161-246	.654	569	567	+0.1
Louisville	16	1032-953	64.5-59.6	+4.9	368-863	.426	108-313	.345	188-262	.718	505	557	-3.2
Marquette	16	998-1013	62.4-63.3	-0.9	339-849	.399	84-256	.328	236-313	.754	563	546	+1.1
Notre Dame	16	1168-883	73.0-55.2	+17.8	418-890	.470	53-137	.387	279-400	.698	628	500	+8.0
Pittsburgh	16	971-1056	60.7-66.0	-5.3	335-873	.384	80-270	.296	221-310	.713	598	611	-0.8
Providence	16	813-958	50.8-59.9	-9.1	314-893	.352	61-222	.275	124-195	.636	549	583	-2.1
Rutgers	16	942-848	58.9-53.0	+5.9	341-809	.422	68-199	.342	192-283	.678	565	526	+2.4
Seton Hall	16	829-1068	51.8-66.8	-14.9	285-877	.325	80-247	.324	179-263	.681	523	619	-6.0
St. John's	16	979-983	61.2-61.4	-0.2	364-844	.431	48-137	.350	203-297	.684	522	590	-4.2
Syracuse	16	1003-1003	62.7-62.7	+0.0	336-879	.382	73-257	.284	258-369	.699	657	538	+7.4
USF	16	912-1083	57.0-67.7	-10.7	337-945	.357	68-225	.302	170-263	.646	575	605	-1.9
Villanova	16	786-937	49.1-58.6	-9.4	283-792	.357	116-412	.282	104-131	.794	437	600	-10.2
West Virginia	16	982-937	61.4-58.6	+2.8	343-853	.402	60-204	.294	236-334	.707	582	535	+2.9

 

ATTENDANCE	Home	Avg		Away	Avg		Neutral	Avg		Total attend	Avg
Cincinnati	8-6478	810		8-29612	3702		0-0	0		16-36090	2256
Connecticut	8-81246	10156		8-39431	4929		0-0	0		16-120677	7542
DePaul	8-25238	3155		8-26082	3260		0-0	0		16-51320	3208
Georgetown	8-10488	1311		8-27840	3480		0-0	0		16-38328	2396
Louisville	8-83133	10392		8-29732	3716		0-0	0		16-112865	7054
Marquette	8-13012	1626		8-18699	2337		0-0	0		16-31711	1982
Notre Dame	8-69137	8642		8-24610	3076		0-0	0		16-93747	5859
Pittsburgh	8-22430	2804		8-33988	4248		0-0	0		16-56418	3526
Providence	8-3846	481		8-11824	1478		0-0	0		16-15670	979
Rutgers	8-26829	3354		8-32527	4066		0-0	0		16-59356	3710
Seton Hall	8-4116	514		8-34767	4346		0-0	0		16-38883	2430
St. John's	8-15718	1965		8-22180	2772		0-0	0		16-37898	2369
Syracuse	8-9510	1189		8-29650	3706		0-0	0		16-39160	2448
USF	8-10320	1290		8-13738	1717		0-0	0		16-24058	1504
Villanova	8-8020	1002		8-17465	2183		0-0	0		16-25485	1593
West Virginia	8-30709	3839		8-28085	3511		0-0	0		16-58794	3675
Totals	128-420230	3283		128-420230	3283		0-0	0		256-840460	3283

 

To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 75.0% of their team's games.

SCORING		Cl	GP	FG	3FG	FT	Points	Avg/G
1.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	133	24	64	354	22.1
2.	RODGERS, Sugar-GU	SO	16	100	47	46	293	18.3
3.	SMITH, Andrea-USF		16	98	23	62	281	17.6
4.	HARRISON, Taneisha-PITT	SR	16	95	33	39	262	16.4
5.	REID, Monique-LOU	JR	16	102	0	57	261	16.3
6.	McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU	SR	15	72	43	42	229	15.3
7.	HAMPTON, Keisha-DPU	JR	16	79	31	50	239	14.9
	REPELLA,Liz-WVU	SR	16	84	35	36	239	14.9
9.	NOVOSEL, Natalie-ND	JR	16	73	8	77	231	14.4
10.	DIGGINS, Skylar-ND	SO	16	71	12	75	229	14.3
11.	ROBINSON, Angel-MU	SR	16	65	12	72	214	13.4
12.	ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU	SO	16	70	0	70	210	13.1
13.	OLIVER, Monique-RU	SO	16	79	0	51	209	13.1
14.	ULIS, Shareese-CIN	SR	16	70	44	24	208	13.0
15.	PETERS, Devereaux-ND	SR	16	87	0	32	206	12.9
16.	ALI,Madina-WVU	SR	16	73	4	55	205	12.8
17.	CREW, Jasmine-SHU	JR	15	71	18	27	187	12.5
18.	HARTLEY, Bria-UCONN	FR	16	74	33	18	199	12.4
19.	HAYES, Tiffany-UCONN	JR	16	62	25	48	197	12.3
20.	SYKES, April-RU	JR	16	75	34	12	196	12.3
21.	SCHIMMEL, Shoni-LOU	FR	16	67	41	16	191	11.9
22.	SMITH, Shenneika-STJ	SO	16	77	5	30	189	11.8
23.	HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU	JR	16	67	0	53	187	11.7
24.	STEVENS, Da'Shena-STJ	JR	16	73	0	35	181	11.3
25.	CHESTER, Felicia-DPU	SR	16	73	1	32	179	11.2
26.	RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU	JR	16	52	1	69	174	10.9
27.	SWEENEY, Laura-VU	SO	16	67	6	32	172	10.8
28.	DOLSON, Stefanie-UCONN	FR	16	72	0	27	171	10.7
29.	MCNUTT, Monica-GU	SR	16	58	33	21	170	10.6
	SIMS, Jania-PITT	SR	16	51	11	57	170	10.6

 

REBOUNDING		Cl	GP	Off	Def	Total	Avg/G
1.	COLE, Chelsea-PITT	SR	16	58	111	169	10.6
2.	PETERS, Devereaux-ND	SR	16	55	71	126	7.9
3.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	37	86	123	7.7
4.	GRANT, Porche-USF		14	53	53	106	7.6
5.	WRIGHT, Teya-PC	SR	16	55	64	119	7.4
6.	HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU	JR	16	47	67	114	7.1
7.	LEE, Chelsey-RU	JR	16	38	75	113	7.1
	ALI,Madina-WVU	SR	16	40	73	113	7.1
9.	FARIS, Kelly-UCONN	SO	16	17	93	110	6.9
10.	CHESTER, Felicia-DPU	SR	16	45	61	106	6.6
11.	OLIVER, Monique-RU	SO	16	40	64	104	6.5
12.	HANKINS, Mi-Khida-PC	SR	16	29	74	103	6.4
13.	PIKES, Taylor-DPU	JR	16	40	62	102	6.4
14.	RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU	JR	16	21	80	101	6.3
	SWEENEY, Laura-VU	SO	16	18	83	101	6.3
16.	RANDOLPH, Jeanise-CIN	FR	16	43	57	100	6.3
17.	REID, Monique-LOU	JR	16	43	54	97	6.1
	ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU	SO	16	43	54	97	6.1
19.	TYSON-THOMAS, Carmen-SU	SO	16	37	55	92	5.8
	HINES, Keshia-LOU	SR	16	40	52	92	5.8
	SCOTT, Shayla-PITT	SR	16	22	70	92	5.8

 

FIELD GOAL PCT		Cl	GP	FG	FGA	Pct
1.	PETERS, Devereaux-ND	SR	16	87	140	.621
2.	DOLSON, Stefanie-UCONN	FR	16	72	118	.610
3.	REID, Monique-LOU	JR	16	102	181	.564
4.	PIKES, Taylor-DPU	JR	16	57	102	.559
5.	CHESTER, Felicia-DPU	SR	16	73	134	.545
6.	OLIVER, Monique-RU	SO	16	79	148	.534
7.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	133	250	.532
8.	LEE, Chelsey-RU	JR	16	60	114	.526
9.	BRUSZEWSKI, Becca-ND	SR	16	64	122	.525
10.	COLLINS, Jasmine-MU	SR	15	49	96	.510
11.	ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU	SO	16	70	139	.504
12.	HARTLEY, Bria-UCONN	FR	16	74	149	.497
13.	ALI,Madina-WVU	SR	16	73	149	.490
14.	HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU	JR	16	67	138	.486
15.	COLE, Chelsea-PITT	SR	16	63	133	.474

 

ASSISTS		Cl	GP	No.	Avg/G
1.	RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU	JR	16	96	6.0
2.	WRIGHT, Rubylee-GU	JR	16	89	5.6
3.	McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ	SO	16	85	5.3
4.	SCHIMMEL, Shoni-LOU	FR	16	82	5.1
5.	ROBINSON, Angel-MU	SR	16	76	4.8
6.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	75	4.7
7.	DIGGINS, Skylar-ND	SO	16	73	4.6
8.	MILES,Sarah-WVU	SR	15	65	4.3
9.	FARIS, Kelly-UCONN	SO	16	62	3.9
	QUIGLEY, Sam-DPU	SR	16	62	3.9
11.	HARRIS, Tasha-SU	SR	16	61	3.8
12.	McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU	SR	15	53	3.5
13.	WELLS, Lola-PC	JR	16	53	3.3
14.	HAYES, Tiffany-UCONN	JR	16	52	3.3
15.	MALLORY, Brittany-ND	SR	16	49	3.1
	DIXON, Lorin-UCONN	SR	16	49	3.1

 

FREE THROW PCT		Cl	GP	FT	FTA	Pct
1.	McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU	SR	15	42	45	.933
2.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	64	73	.877
3.	RODGERS, Sugar-GU	SO	16	46	53	.868
4.	McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ	SO	16	52	61	.852
5.	SWEENEY, Laura-VU	SO	16	32	38	.842
6.	REPELLA,Liz-WVU	SR	16	36	45	.800
7.	SIMS, Jania-PITT	SR	16	57	72	.792
8.	WRIGHT, Teya-PC	SR	16	34	43	.791
9.	ALI,Madina-WVU	SR	16	55	70	.786
10.	REID, Monique-LOU	JR	16	57	74	.770
11.	ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU	SO	16	70	91	.769
	HAMPTON, Keisha-DPU	JR	16	50	65	.769
13.	ROBINSON, Angel-MU	SR	16	72	94	.766
14.	DIGGINS, Skylar-ND	SO	16	75	98	.765
15.	NOVOSEL, Natalie-ND	JR	16	77	102	.755

 

STEALS		Cl	GP	No.	Avg/G
1.	RODGERS, Sugar-GU	SO	16	43	2.7
2.	GIBBS, Tia-LOU	SO	16	40	2.5
3.	MALLORY, Brittany-ND	SR	16	36	2.3
4.	SWEENEY, Laura-VU	SO	16	35	2.2
5.	SCHIMMEL, Shoni-LOU	FR	16	34	2.1
6.	MILES,Sarah-WVU	SR	15	31	2.1
7.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	33	2.1
8.	DIGGINS, Skylar-ND	SO	16	32	2.0
9.	ROBERTS, Symone-PC	SO	15	29	1.9
10.	ROBINSON, Angel-MU	SR	16	30	1.9
	McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ	SO	16	30	1.9
12.	FARIS, Kelly-UCONN	SO	16	29	1.8
	NOVOSEL, Natalie-ND	JR	16	29	1.8
	MORROW, Erica-SU	SR	16	29	1.8
	MAGEE, Tia-GU	JR	16	29	1.8

 

3-POINT FG PCT		Cl	GP	3FG	3FGA	Pct
1.	MALLORY, Brittany-ND	SR	16	22	47	.468
2.	DOOMES-STEPHENS, Le-USF		15	17	37	.459
3.	HARTLEY, Bria-UCONN	FR	16	33	75	.440
4.	HAYES, Tiffany-UCONN	JR	16	25	57	.439
5.	BURAKOSKI, Amanda-STJ	SO	16	28	64	.438
6.	QUIGLEY, Sam-DPU	SR	16	32	80	.400
	HALL, Elashier-SU	SO	16	20	50	.400
8.	McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU	SR	15	43	113	.381
9.	BURKE, Becky-LOU	JR	16	29	77	.377
	WHEELER, Erica-RU	SO	16	29	77	.377
11.	CREW, Jasmine-SHU	JR	15	18	48	.375
12.	HAMPTON, Keisha-DPU	JR	16	31	83	.373
13.	ULIS, Shareese-CIN	SR	16	44	118	.373
14.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	24	65	.369
15.	REPELLA,Liz-WVU	SR	16	35	95	.368

 

3-POINT FG MADE		Cl	GP	3FG	Avg/G
1.	RODGERS, Sugar-GU	SO	16	47	2.9
2.	McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU	SR	15	43	2.9
3.	KIMMEL, Lindsay-VU	JR	16	45	2.8
4.	ULIS, Shareese-CIN	SR	16	44	2.8
5.	SCHIMMEL, Shoni-LOU	FR	16	41	2.6
6.	REPELLA,Liz-WVU	SR	16	35	2.2
7.	SYKES, April-RU	JR	16	34	2.1
8.	HARTLEY, Bria-UCONN	FR	16	33	2.1
	HARRISON, Taneisha-PITT	SR	16	33	2.1
	MCNUTT, Monica-GU	SR	16	33	2.1
11.	QUIGLEY, Sam-DPU	SR	16	32	2.0
12.	HAMPTON, Keisha-DPU	JR	16	31	1.9
13.	WHEELER, Erica-RU	SO	16	29	1.8
	BURKE, Becky-LOU	JR	16	29	1.8
15.	BURAKOSKI, Amanda-STJ	SO	16	28	1.8

 

BLOCKED SHOTS		Cl	GP	No.	Avg/G
1.	COLE, Chelsea-PITT	SR	16	33	2.1
	ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU	SO	16	33	2.1
3.	PETERS, Devereaux-ND	SR	16	30	1.9
4.	OLIVER, Monique-RU	SO	16	27	1.7
	HARRY, Katherine-DPU	SO	16	27	1.7
6.	BUSSIE,Asya-WVU	SO	16	26	1.6
	SWEENEY, Laura-VU	SO	16	26	1.6
8.	LEE, Chelsey-RU	JR	16	25	1.6
9.	MC DONALD, Akila-USF		14	20	1.4
10.	REPELLA,Liz-WVU	SR	16	22	1.4
11.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	19	1.2
	HANKINS, Mi-Khida-PC	SR	16	19	1.2
	VAILS, Sheronne-LOU	FR	16	19	1.2
14.	SCOTT, Shayla-PITT	SR	16	17	1.1
	DOLSON, Stefanie-UCONN	FR	16	17	1.1

 

ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO		Cl	GP	Assists	Avg	T-Overs	Avg	Ratio
1.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	75	4.7	37	2.3	2.0
2.	RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU	JR	16	96	6.0	52	3.3	1.8
3.	DIXON, Lorin-UCONN	SR	16	49	3.1	27	1.7	1.8
4.	MARTIN, Anna-DPU	SO	16	45	2.8	26	1.6	1.7
5.	FARIS, Kelly-UCONN	SO	16	62	3.9	39	2.4	1.6
6.	ROBINSON, Angel-MU	SR	16	76	4.8	51	3.2	1.5
7.	HAYES, Tiffany-UCONN	JR	16	52	3.3	36	2.3	1.4
8.	MALLORY, Brittany-ND	SR	16	49	3.1	34	2.1	1.4
9.	QUIGLEY, Sam-DPU	SR	16	62	3.9	44	2.8	1.4
10.	McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ	SO	16	85	5.3	64	4.0	1.3
11.	WELLS, Lola-PC	JR	16	53	3.3	40	2.5	1.3
12.	WRIGHT, Rubylee-GU	JR	16	89	5.6	68	4.3	1.3
13.	HARRIS, Tasha-SU	SR	16	61	3.8	51	3.2	1.2
14.	MILES,Sarah-WVU	SR	15	65	4.3	55	3.7	1.2
15.	DIGGINS, Skylar-ND	SO	16	73	4.6	63	3.9	1.2

 

OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS		Cl	GP	No.	Avg/G
1.	GRANT, Porche-USF		14	53	3.8
2.	COLE, Chelsea-PITT	SR	16	58	3.6
3.	WRIGHT, Teya-PC	SR	16	55	3.4
	PETERS, Devereaux-ND	SR	16	55	3.4
5.	HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU	JR	16	47	2.9
6.	CHESTER, Felicia-DPU	SR	16	45	2.8
7.	RANDOLPH, Jeanise-CIN	FR	16	43	2.7
	REID, Monique-LOU	JR	16	43	2.7
	ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU	SO	16	43	2.7
10.	DOOMES-STEPHENS, Le-USF		15	40	2.7
11.	BUSSIE,Asya-WVU	SO	16	42	2.6
12.	CRAWFORD, Adria-GU	JR	15	38	2.5
13.	ASHMEADE, Tajay-SHU	JR	16	40	2.5
	PIKES, Taylor-DPU	JR	16	40	2.5
	OLIVER, Monique-RU	SO	16	40	2.5
	ALI,Madina-WVU	SR	16	40	2.5
	HINES, Keshia-LOU	SR	16	40	2.5

 

DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS		Cl	GP	No.	Avg/G
1.	COLE, Chelsea-PITT	SR	16	111	6.9
2.	FARIS, Kelly-UCONN	SO	16	93	5.8
3.	MOORE, Maya-UCONN	SR	16	86	5.4
4.	SWEENEY, Laura-VU	SO	16	83	5.2
5.	RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU	JR	16	80	5.0
6.	LEE, Chelsey-RU	JR	16	75	4.7
7.	HANKINS, Mi-Khida-PC	SR	16	74	4.6
8.	ALI,Madina-WVU	SR	16	73	4.6
9.	McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ	SO	16	72	4.5
10.	PETERS, Devereaux-ND	SR	16	71	4.4
11.	SCOTT, Shayla-PITT	SR	16	70	4.4
12.	HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU	JR	16	67	4.2
	ROBINSON, Angel-MU	SR	16	67	4.2
14.	WRIGHT, Teya-PC	SR	16	64	4.0
	OLIVER, Monique-RU	SO	16	64	4.0

 

MINUTES PLAYED		Cl	GP	Minutes	Avg/G
1.	ROBINSON, Angel-MU	SR	16	606	37.9
2.	McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU	SR	15	550	36.7
3.	ULIS, Shareese-CIN	SR	16	584	36.5
4.	REPELLA,Liz-WVU	SR	16	583	36.4
5.	SYKES, April-RU	JR	16	571	35.7
6.	RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU	JR	16	569	35.6
7.	SMITH, Andrea-USF		16	564	35.2
8.	HARRISON, Taneisha-PITT	SR	16	556	34.8
9.	COOK, Kayla-CIN	FR	16	554	34.6
10.	RODGERS, Sugar-GU	SO	16	552	34.5

 

TEAM IDENTIFICATION	Team ID
Cincinnati	CIN
Connecticut	UCONN
DePaul	DPU
Georgetown	GU
Louisville	LOU
Marquette	MU
Notre Dame	ND
Pittsburgh	PITT
Providence	PC
Rutgers	RU
Seton Hall	SHU
St. John's	STJ
Syracuse	SU
USF	USF
Villanova	VU
West Virginia	WVU