2010 BIG EAST Women's Lacrosse

Conference-Only Statistics

 

CONFERENCE LACROSSE STATISTICS

 

GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Georgetown 8 130 16.25
2. Loyola (Md.) 8 114 14.25
3. Syracuse 8 108 13.50
4. Louisville 8 104 13.00
5. Rutgers 8 99 12.38
6. Notre Dame 8 96 12.00
7. Connecticut 8 69 8.62
8. Cincinnati 8 65 8.12
9. Villanova 8 61 7.62
 
ASSISTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 8 61 7.62
2. Georgetown 8 49 6.12
3. Notre Dame 8 45 5.62
4. Loyola (Md.) 8 44 5.50
5. Rutgers 8 42 5.25
6. Louisville 8 39 4.88
7. Connecticut 8 25 3.12
8. Villanova 8 23 2.88
9. Cincinnati 8 22 2.75
 
GROUND BALLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Loyola (Md.) 8 167 20.88
2. Louisville 8 165 20.62
3. Georgetown 8 145 18.12
4. Connecticut 8 136 17.00
5. Cincinnati 8 135 16.88
6. Notre Dame 8 132 16.50
7. Rutgers 8 117 14.62
8. Syracuse 8 113 14.12
9. Villanova 8 100 12.50
 
POINTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Georgetown 8 179 22.38
2. Syracuse 8 169 21.12
3. Loyola (Md.) 8 158 19.75
4. Louisville 8 143 17.88
5. Notre Dame 8 141 17.62
Rutgers 8 141 17.62
7. Connecticut 8 94 11.75
8. Cincinnati 8 87 10.88
9. Villanova 8 84 10.50
 
DRAW CONTROLS/GAME Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. Georgetown 8 121 15.12
2. Rutgers 8 115 14.38
Louisville 8 115 14.38
4. Loyola (Md.) 8 108 13.50
5. Villanova 8 101 12.62
6. Syracuse 8 99 12.38
7. Cincinnati 8 89 11.12
8. Connecticut 8 87 10.88
Notre Dame 8 87 10.88
 
FOULS/GAME Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. Cincinnati 8 252 31.50
2. Loyola (Md.) 8 215 26.88
3. Rutgers 8 209 26.12
4. Georgetown 8 200 25.00
5. Louisville 8 194 24.25
6. Notre Dame 8 161 20.12
7. Syracuse 8 160 20.00
8. Connecticut 8 122 15.25
9. Villanova 8 111 13.88
 
SHOTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Georgetown 8 271 33.88
2. Syracuse 8 259 32.38
3. Louisville 8 251 31.38
4. Loyola (Md.) 8 249 31.12
5. Notre Dame 8 233 29.12
6. Rutgers 8 213 26.62
7. Villanova 8 179 22.38
8. Cincinnati 8 145 18.12
9. Connecticut 8 141 17.62
 
SHOT PERCENT GP Goals Shots Pct.
1. Connecticut 8 69 141 .489
2. Georgetown 8 130 271 .480
3. Rutgers 8 99 213 .465
4. Loyola (Md.) 8 114 249 .458
5. Cincinnati 8 65 145 .448
6. Syracuse 8 108 259 .417
7. Louisville 8 104 251 .414
8. Notre Dame 8 96 233 .412
9. Villanova 8 61 179 .341
 
TURNOVERS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 8 111 13.88
2. Georgetown 8 114 14.25
3. Loyola (Md.) 8 124 15.50
4. Notre Dame 8 128 16.00
5. Rutgers 8 129 16.12
6. Louisville 8 135 16.88
7. Villanova 8 146 18.25
Connecticut 8 146 18.25
9. Cincinnati 8 161 20.12
 
CAUSED TURNOVER/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Loyola (Md.) 8 115 14.38
2. Georgetown 8 101 12.62
3. Notre Dame 8 91 11.38
4. Louisville 8 90 11.25
5. Rutgers 8 73 9.12
6. Syracuse 8 66 8.25
7. Cincinnati 8 58 7.25
8. Connecticut 8 40 5.00
9. Villanova 8 28 3.50
 
GOALS AGAINST AVERAGE GP GA Minutes GA Avg.
1. Syracuse 8 56 480:00 7.00
2. Notre Dame 8 62 486:00 7.65
3. Georgetown 8 80 487:49 9.84
4. Loyola (Md.) 8 83 487:54 10.21
5. Louisville 8 93 479:55 11.63
6. Rutgers 8 103 486:00 12.72
7. Connecticut 8 107 486:00 13.21
8. Villanova 8 129 486:00 15.93
9. Cincinnati 8 133 492:00 16.22
 
SHUTOUTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Notre Dame 8 1 0.12
2. Georgetown 8 0 0.00
Loyola (Md.) 8 0 0.00
Louisville 8 0 0.00
Rutgers 8 0 0.00
Connecticut 8 0 0.00
Villanova 8 0 0.00
Cincinnati 8 0 0.00
Syracuse 8 0 0.00
 
SAVES/GAME GP Saves Avg/G
1. Syracuse 8 90 11.25
2. Cincinnati 8 89 11.12
3. Rutgers 8 71 8.88
4. Louisville 8 68 8.50
5. Connecticut 8 63 7.88
6. Villanova 8 61 7.62
7. Notre Dame 8 59 7.38
8. Loyola (Md.) 8 58 7.25
9. Georgetown 8 56 7.00
 
SAVE PERCENT GP GA Saves Save%
1. Syracuse 8 56 90 .616
2. Notre Dame 8 62 59 .488
3. Louisville 8 93 68 .422
4. Georgetown 8 80 56 .412
5. Loyola (Md.) 8 83 58 .411
6. Rutgers 8 103 71 .408
7. Cincinnati 8 133 89 .401
8. Connecticut 8 107 63 .371
9. Villanova 8 129 61 .321
 
SHOTS ON GOAL/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Georgetown 8 200 25.00
2. Loyola (Md.) 8 194 24.25
3. Louisville 8 185 23.12
4. Syracuse 8 180 22.50
5. Notre Dame 8 173 21.62
6. Rutgers 8 167 20.88
7. Villanova 8 121 15.12
8. Cincinnati 8 114 14.25
9. Connecticut 8 113 14.12
 

Standings Conference Pct. GF GA   Overall Pct. GF GA
Georgetown 8-0 1.000 130 80   8-0 1.000 130 80
Syracuse 6-2 .750 108 56   6-2 .750 108 56
Notre Dame 6-2 .750 96 62   6-2 .750 96 62
Loyola (Md.) 5-3 .625 114 83   5-3 .625 114 83
Louisville 4-4 .500 104 93   4-4 .500 104 93
Rutgers 4-4 .500 99 103   4-4 .500 99 103
Connecticut 2-6 .250 69 107   2-6 .250 69 107
Villanova 1-7 .125 61 129   1-7 .125 61 129
Cincinnati 0-8 .000 65 133   0-8 .000 65 133
 
Current unbeaten streak No. Record in streak
Georgetown 8 8-0
Louisville 2 2-0
Notre Dame 1 1-0
Rutgers 1 1-0
 
Team Summaries GP GF-GA Margin Shot% Save% GB DC TO CT Pen-PIM
Cincinnati 8 65-133 -8.5 .448 .401 135 89 161 58 0-0.0
Connecticut 8 69-107 -4.8 .489 .371 136 87 146 40 0-0.0
Georgetown 8 130-80 +6.2 .480 .412 145 121 114 101 1-3.0
Louisville 8 104-93 +1.4 .414 .422 165 115 135 90 19-57.0
Loyola (Md.) 8 114-83 +3.9 .458 .411 167 108 124 115 5-15.0
Notre Dame 8 96-62 +4.2 .412 .488 132 87 128 91 0-0.0
Rutgers 8 99-103 -0.5 .465 .408 117 115 129 73 0-0.0
Syracuse 8 108-56 +6.5 .417 .616 113 99 111 66 4-12.0
Villanova 8 61-129 -8.5 .341 .321 100 101 146 28 0-0.0
 
Attendance Home Average   Away Average   Neutral Average   Total Average
Cincinnati 4-973 243   4-1205 301   0-0 0   8-2178 272
Connecticut 4-1339 335   4-1691 423   0-0 0   8-3030 379
Georgetown 4-3048 762   4-1208 302   0-0 0   8-4256 532
Louisville 4-1349 337   4-2258 564   0-0 0   8-3607 451
Loyola (Md.) 4-2804 701   4-1670 418   0-0 0   8-4474 559
Notre Dame 4-2544 636   4-1975 494   0-0 0   8-4519 565
Rutgers 4-932 233   4-3291 823   0-0 0   8-4223 528
Syracuse 4-1808 452   4-928 232   0-0 0   8-2736 342
Villanova 4-866 216   4-1437 359   0-0 0   8-2303 288
Totals 36-15663 435   36-15663 435   0-0 0   72-31326 435  
 
 

INDIVIDUAL LACROSSE STATISTICS

 

To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 50.0% of their team's games.

GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 8 34 4.25
GAVIN,Grace-LOY 8 34 4.25
3. LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 8 25 3.12
CANTWELL, Brooke-RU 8 25 3.12
5. SIMANSKI, Laura-CIN 8 23 2.88
6. DOVE, Christina-SU 8 22 2.75
7. QUILLINAN, Halley-SU 8 21 2.62
8. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 8 20 2.50
9. HENEBERRY,Mary-LOY 8 19 2.38
10. LADOUCEUR, Tee-SU 8 18 2.25
FORD, Molly-GU 8 18 2.25
SCIOSCIA, Gina-ND 8 18 2.25
 
ASSISTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. OLIVERIO, Katie-LOU 8 26 3.25
2. SCIOSCIA, Gina-ND 8 17 2.12
3. DOVE, Christina-SU 8 16 2.00
4. FORD, Molly-GU 8 14 1.75
5. LADOUCEUR, Tee-SU 8 13 1.62
6. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 8 12 1.50
7. RYBINSKI, Erica-VU 8 11 1.38
8. TAMASITIS, Maggie-ND 8 10 1.25
9. CANTWELL, Brooke-RU 8 9 1.12
FLANAGAN, Meghan-RU 8 9 1.12
TUMOLO, Michelle-SU 8 9 1.12
 
POINTS/GAME GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 8 34 12 46 5.75
2. OLIVERIO, Katie-LOU 8 13 26 39 4.88
3. DOVE, Christina-SU 8 22 16 38 4.75
4. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 8 34 3 37 4.62
5. SCIOSCIA, Gina-ND 8 18 17 35 4.38
6. CANTWELL, Brooke-RU 8 25 9 34 4.25
7. FORD, Molly-GU 8 18 14 32 4.00
8. LADOUCEUR, Tee-SU 8 18 13 31 3.88
9. LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 8 25 4 29 3.62
10. SIMANSKI, Laura-CIN 8 23 3 26 3.25
HENEBERRY,Mary-LOY 8 19 7 26 3.25
 
GAME-WINNING GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 8 3 0.38
TUMOLO, Michelle-SU 8 3 0.38
3. GILES, Jacqueline-GU 8 2 0.25
O'REILLY, Bunny-GU 8 2 0.25
OLIVERIO, Katie-LOU 8 2 0.25
ABT, Kailene-ND 8 2 0.25
KAESTNER, Ashby-GU 8 2 0.25
QUILLINAN, Halley-SU 8 2 0.25
 
GROUND BALLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. KING, Ashley-LOU 8 26 3.25
2. GIBSON,Emily-LOY 8 24 3.00
DOHERTY, Jackie-ND 8 24 3.00
HOGAN, Liz-SU 8 24 3.00
5. HENEBERRY,Ana-LOY 8 23 2.88
 
SHOTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 8 72 9.00
2. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 8 70 8.75
3. DOVE, Christina-SU 8 56 7.00
4. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 8 49 6.12
5. LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 8 46 5.75
6. QUILLINAN, Halley-SU 8 45 5.62
BLANEY, Shaylyn-ND 8 45 5.62
8. SCIOSCIA, Gina-ND 8 43 5.38
DONODEO, Justine-VU 8 43 5.38
10. SIMANSKI, Laura-CIN 8 40 5.00
 
DRAW CONTROLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. STEINBERG, Ali-RU 8 26 3.25
2. KAESTNER, Ashby-GU 8 25 3.12
DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 8 25 3.12
4. GIUST, Shawna-VU 8 23 2.88
5. LOPEZ, Shawn-RU 8 22 2.75
 
CAUSED TURNOVERS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. BLANEY, Shaylyn-ND 8 23 2.88
2. MCCRAW, Logan-GU 7 18 2.57
3. HENEBERRY,Ana-LOY 8 20 2.50
4. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 8 18 2.25
5. GIBSON,Emily-LOY 8 17 2.12
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG (Max. 20.00) GP GA Minutes GA Avg
1. HOGAN, Liz-SU 8 56 479:19 7.01
2. HILLING, Ellie-ND 8 61 483:43 7.57
3. STOOTHOFF,Kerry-LOY 8 68 427:23 9.55
4. FORMBY, Caitlin-GU 8 72 430:40 10.03
5. PAWLIW, Danielle-LOU 8 90 468:19 11.53
6. KALATA, Lily-RU 8 85 397:50 12.82
7. MOULTON, Jenna-UCONN 8 105 471:27 13.36
8. RUSSO, Katherine-CIN 8 119 437:35 16.32
9. LANGAN, Maggie-VU 8 100 361:21 16.60
 
SAVE PERCENTAGE GP Saves GA Save Pct.
1. HOGAN, Liz-SU 8 90 56 .616
2. HILLING, Ellie-ND 8 59 61 .492
3. STOOTHOFF,Kerry-LOY 8 56 68 .452
4. FORMBY, Caitlin-GU 8 54 72 .429
5. PAWLIW, Danielle-LOU 8 67 90 .427
6. KALATA, Lily-RU 8 61 85 .418
7. RUSSO, Katherine-CIN 8 83 119 .411
8. MOULTON, Jenna-UCONN 8 62 105 .371
9. LANGAN, Maggie-VU 8 47 100 .320
 
SAVES/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. HOGAN, Liz-SU 8 90 11.25
2. RUSSO, Katherine-CIN 8 83 10.38
3. PAWLIW, Danielle-LOU 8 67 8.38
4. MOULTON, Jenna-UCONN 8 62 7.75
5. KALATA, Lily-RU 8 61 7.62
6. HILLING, Ellie-ND 8 59 7.38
7. STOOTHOFF,Kerry-LOY 8 56 7.00
8. FORMBY, Caitlin-GU 8 54 6.75
9. LANGAN, Maggie-VU 8 47 5.88
 
SHUTOUTS/GAME GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. HILLING, Ellie-ND 8 1 0.12
 
FREE-POSITION GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 8 11 1.38
2. DOVE, Christina-SU 8 7 0.88
LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 8 7 0.88
4. SIMANSKI, Laura-CIN 8 6 0.75
5. KIRR, Jordy-GU 7 5 0.71
 
Team Identification Team ID
Cincinnati CIN
Connecticut UCONN
Georgetown GU
Louisville LOU
Loyola (Md.) LOY
Notre Dame ND
Rutgers RU
Syracuse SU
Villanova VU