2011 BIG EAST Women's Lacrosse

Conference-Only Statistics


 

CONFERENCE LACROSSE STATISTICS

 

GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Loyola 8 114 14.25
2. Georgetown 8 113 14.12
3. Syracuse 8 109 13.62
4. Louisville 8 105 13.12
5. Notre Dame 8 104 13.00
6. Connecticut 8 91 11.38
7. Rutgers 8 70 8.75
8. Villanova 8 64 8.00
9. Cincinnati 8 57 7.12
 
ASSISTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 8 56 7.00
2. Notre Dame 8 47 5.88
3. Georgetown 8 42 5.25
4. Cincinnati 8 33 4.12
Loyola 8 33 4.12
6. Louisville 8 32 4.00
7. Connecticut 8 27 3.38
8. Villanova 8 25 3.12
9. Rutgers 8 22 2.75
 
GROUND BALLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Loyola 8 153 19.12
2. Notre Dame 8 143 17.88
3. Villanova 8 138 17.25
4. Louisville 8 136 17.00
5. Georgetown 8 129 16.12
6. Cincinnati 8 126 15.75
Rutgers 8 126 15.75
8. Connecticut 8 120 15.00
9. Syracuse 8 106 13.25
 
POINTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 8 165 20.62
2. Georgetown 8 155 19.38
3. Notre Dame 8 151 18.88
4. Loyola 8 147 18.38
5. Louisville 8 137 17.12
6. Connecticut 8 118 14.75
7. Rutgers 8 92 11.50
8. Cincinnati 8 90 11.25
9. Villanova 8 89 11.12
 
DRAW CONTROLS/GAME Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. Louisville 8 123 15.38
2. Connecticut 8 113 14.12
3. Loyola 8 109 13.62
4. Notre Dame 8 101 12.62
5. Georgetown 8 100 12.50
6. Syracuse 8 92 11.50
7. Villanova 8 89 11.12
8. Cincinnati 8 87 10.88
9. Rutgers 8 78 9.75
 
FOULS/GAME Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. Louisville 8 212 26.50
2. Loyola 8 209 26.12
3. Notre Dame 8 187 23.38
4. Cincinnati 8 181 22.62
5. Syracuse 8 175 21.88
6. Villanova 8 163 20.38
Rutgers 8 163 20.38
Georgetown 8 163 20.38
9. Connecticut 8 156 19.50
 
SHOTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Notre Dame 8 252 31.50
2. Georgetown 8 251 31.38
3. Louisville 8 238 29.75
4. Loyola 8 228 28.50
5. Connecticut 8 212 26.50
6. Syracuse 8 197 24.62
7. Rutgers 8 191 23.88
8. Villanova 8 175 21.88
9. Cincinnati 8 126 15.75
 
SHOT PERCENT GP Goals Shots Pct.
1. Syracuse 8 109 197 .553
2. Loyola 8 114 228 .500
3. Cincinnati 8 57 126 .452
4. Georgetown 8 113 251 .450
5. Louisville 8 105 238 .441
6. Connecticut 8 91 212 .429
7. Notre Dame 8 104 252 .413
8. Rutgers 8 70 191 .366
9. Villanova 8 64 175 .366
 
TURNOVERS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 8 100 12.50
2. Georgetown 8 103 12.88
3. Rutgers 8 115 14.38
4. Louisville 8 121 15.12
5. Loyola 8 133 16.62
6. Notre Dame 8 140 17.50
7. Connecticut 8 160 20.00
8. Villanova 8 161 20.12
9. Cincinnati 8 172 21.50
 
CAUSED TURNOVER/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Georgetown 8 105 13.12
2. Loyola 8 99 12.38
3. Notre Dame 8 86 10.75
4. Connecticut 8 65 8.12
5. Syracuse 8 64 8.00
6. Louisville 8 62 7.75
7. Rutgers 8 58 7.25
8. Villanova 8 46 5.75
9. Cincinnati 8 40 5.00
 
GOALS AGAINST AVERAGE GP GA Minutes GA Avg.
1. Syracuse 8 63 480:00 7.88
2. Notre Dame 8 71 480:00 8.88
3. Loyola 8 72 480:00 9.00
4. Georgetown 8 80 480:00 10.00
5. Rutgers 8 84 480:00 10.50
6. Louisville 8 101 480:00 12.62
7. Connecticut 8 105 480:00 13.12
8. Villanova 8 120 480:00 15.00
9. Cincinnati 8 131 480:00 16.38
 
SHUTOUTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 8 0 0.00
Notre Dame 8 0 0.00
Loyola 8 0 0.00
Georgetown 8 0 0.00
Rutgers 8 0 0.00
Louisville 8 0 0.00
Connecticut 8 0 0.00
Villanova 8 0 0.00
Cincinnati 8 0 0.00
 
SAVES/GAME GP Saves Avg/G
1. Connecticut 8 76 9.50
Cincinnati 8 76 9.50
3. Villanova 8 70 8.75
4. Syracuse 8 67 8.38
5. Loyola 8 66 8.25
6. Notre Dame 8 61 7.62
7. Louisville 8 59 7.38
8. Rutgers 8 57 7.12
9. Georgetown 8 35 4.38
 
SAVE PERCENT GP GA Saves Save%
1. Syracuse 8 63 67 .515
2. Loyola 8 72 66 .478
3. Notre Dame 8 71 61 .462
4. Connecticut 8 105 76 .420
5. Rutgers 8 84 57 .404
6. Louisville 8 101 59 .369
7. Villanova 8 120 70 .368
8. Cincinnati 8 131 76 .367
9. Georgetown 8 80 35 .304
 
SHOTS ON GOAL/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Georgetown 8 184 23.00
2. Notre Dame 8 180 22.50
3. Louisville 8 174 21.75
4. Loyola 8 166 20.75
5. Syracuse 8 165 20.62
6. Connecticut 8 161 20.12
7. Rutgers 8 138 17.25
8. Villanova 8 129 16.12
9. Cincinnati 8 91 11.38
 


Standings Conference Pct. GF GA   Overall Pct. GF GA
Georgetown 7-1 .875 113 80   7-1 .875 113 80
Syracuse 7-1 .875 109 63   7-1 .875 109 63
Loyola 6-2 .750 114 72   6-2 .750 114 72
Notre Dame 6-2 .750 104 71   6-2 .750 104 71
Louisville 3-5 .375 105 101   3-5 .375 105 101
Connecticut 3-5 .375 91 105   3-5 .375 91 105
Rutgers 3-5 .375 70 84   3-5 .375 70 84
Villanova 1-7 .125 64 120   1-7 .125 64 120
Cincinnati 0-8 .000 57 131   0-8 .000 57 131
 
Current unbeaten streak No. Record in streak
Syracuse 4 4-0
Notre Dame 4 4-0
Georgetown 1 1-0
Loyola 1 1-0
 
Team Summaries GP GF-GA Margin Shot% Save% GB DC Face% TO CT Pen-PIM
Cincinnati 8 57-131 -9.2 .452 .367 126 87 .000 172 40 2-0.0
Connecticut 8 91-105 -1.8 .429 .420 120 113 .000 160 65 0-0.0
Georgetown 8 113-80 +4.1 .450 .304 129 100 .000 103 105 0-0.0
Louisville 8 105-101 +0.5 .441 .369 136 123 .000 121 62 0-0.0
Loyola 8 114-72 +5.2 .500 .478 153 109 .000 133 99 0-0.0
Notre Dame 8 104-71 +4.1 .413 .462 143 101 .000 140 86 0-0.0
Rutgers 8 70-84 -1.8 .366 .404 126 78 .000 115 58 0-0.0
Syracuse 8 109-63 +5.8 .553 .515 106 92 .000 100 64 0-0.0
Villanova 8 64-120 -7.0 .366 .368 138 89 .000 161 46 0-0.0
 
Attendance Home Average   Away Average   Neutral Average   Total Average
Cincinnati 4-1115 279   4-1366 342   0-0 0   8-2481 310
Connecticut 4-703 176   4-1888 472   0-0 0   8-2591 324
Georgetown 4-2320 580   4-1703 426   0-0 0   8-4023 503
Louisville 4-1128 282   4-1659 415   0-0 0   8-2787 348
Loyola 4-2098 524   4-1335 334   0-0 0   8-3433 429
Notre Dame 4-2663 666   4-1664 416   0-0 0   8-4327 541
Rutgers 4-803 201   4-1276 319   0-0 0   8-2079 260
Syracuse 4-2316 579   4-1764 441   0-0 0   8-4080 510
Villanova 4-983 246   4-1474 368   0-0 0   8-2457 307
Totals 36-14129 392   36-14129 392   0-0 0   72-28258 392  
 

 

INDIVIDUAL LACROSSE STATISTICS

 

To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 60.0% of their team's games.

GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. GAVIN, Grace-LOY 8 28 3.50
LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 8 28 3.50
FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 8 28 3.50
4. LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 8 27 3.38
5. THOMAS, Sophia-GU 8 24 3.00
6. DONODEO, Justine-VU 8 18 2.25
DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 8 18 2.25
HOLDEN, Sarah-SU 8 18 2.25
9. HENEBERRY, Mary-LOY 7 15 2.14
10. STEINBER, Ali-RU 8 17 2.12
 
ASSISTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. TAMASITIS, Maggie-ND 8 20 2.50
2. TUMOLO, Michelle-SU 8 19 2.38
3. KIRIAZOGLOU, Katie-CIN 8 17 2.12
4. OLIVERIO, Katie-LOU 8 13 1.62
KIRR, Jordy-GU 8 13 1.62
6. TUPPER, Kiersten-UCONN 7 11 1.57
7. GAVIN, Grace-LOY 8 12 1.50
8. LADOUCEUR, Tee-SU 8 11 1.38
9. LIBERATORE, Katie-CIN 8 10 1.25
10. BOWMAN, Maria-VU 8 8 1.00
MARINO, Katherine-RU 8 8 1.00
 
POINTS/GAME GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. GAVIN, Grace-LOY 8 28 12 40 5.00
2. LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 8 27 6 33 4.12
3. LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 8 28 4 32 4.00
4. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 8 28 3 31 3.88
TUMOLO, Michelle-SU 8 12 19 31 3.88
6. TAMASITIS, Maggie-ND 8 10 20 30 3.75
7. THOMAS, Sophia-GU 8 24 5 29 3.62
8. KIRIAZOGLOU, Katie-CIN 8 11 17 28 3.50
9. LADOUCEUR, Tee-SU 8 15 11 26 3.25
10. OLIVERIO, Katie-LOU 8 12 13 25 3.12
KIRR, Jordy-GU 8 12 13 25 3.12
 
GAME-WINNING GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. TUMOLO, Michelle-SU 8 3 0.38
2. STEINBER, Ali-RU 8 2 0.25
REHFUSS, Abby-LOY 8 2 0.25
HOLDEN, Sarah-SU 8 2 0.25
ABT, Kailene-ND 8 2 0.25
BOZEL, Kelsi-GU 8 2 0.25
GILES, Jacqueline-GU 8 2 0.25
 
GROUND BALLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. THOMAS, Sophia-GU 8 26 3.25
2. DOHERTY, Jackie-ND 8 22 2.75
KALATA, Lily-RU 8 22 2.75
4. GALLAGHER, Kellye-LOY 8 21 2.62
5. BLANEY, Shaylyn-ND 8 20 2.50
RAMSLAND, Kylie-CIN 8 20 2.50
STOOTHOFF, Kerry-LOY 8 20 2.50
 
SHOTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 8 77 9.62
2. LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 8 61 7.62
3. GAVIN, Grace-LOY 8 60 7.50
4. BLANEY, Shaylyn-ND 8 53 6.62
5. WELSH, Marlena-RU 8 48 6.00
6. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 8 47 5.88
7. DONODEO, Justine-VU 8 45 5.62
8. THOMAS, Sophia-GU 8 43 5.38
9. LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 8 41 5.12
10. STEINBER, Ali-RU 8 40 5.00
 
DRAW CONTROLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 8 28 3.50
2. DECKER, Meg-LOY 8 24 3.00
3. DOHERTY, Jackie-ND 8 21 2.62
GAVIN, Grace-LOY 8 21 2.62
5. MCCRAW, Logan-GU 8 20 2.50
 
CAUSED TURNOVERS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. DOHERTY, Jackie-ND 8 26 3.25
2. THOMAS, Sophia-GU 8 20 2.50
3. GALLAGHER, Kellye-LOY 8 17 2.12
4. BLANEY, Shaylyn-ND 8 15 1.88
5. FREEDMAN, Kelyn-GU 6 11 1.83
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG (Max. 20.00) GP GA Minutes GA Avg
1. HOGAN, Liz-SU 8 53 423:54 7.50
2. HILLING, Ellie-ND 8 66 438:43 9.03
3. BLACK, Barb-GU 8 60 388:04 9.28
4. STOOTHOFF, Kerry-LOY 8 61 386:29 9.47
5. KALATA, Lily-RU 8 74 426:23 10.41
6. HERBST, Ashley-LOU 7 66 333:59 11.86
7. TESTA, Brittney-UCONN 8 96 448:20 12.85
8. HIRSCHFELD, Amanda-VU 8 59 252:39 14.01
9. TODD, Julia-VU 6 37 151:46 14.63
10. WALSH, Jen-CIN 8 93 343:54 16.23
 
SAVE PERCENTAGE GP Saves GA Save Pct.
1. HOGAN, Liz-SU 8 63 53 .543
2. STOOTHOFF, Kerry-LOY 8 54 61 .470
3. HILLING, Ellie-ND 8 57 66 .463
4. TESTA, Brittney-UCONN 8 70 96 .422
5. HIRSCHFELD, Amanda-VU 8 42 59 .416
6. KALATA, Lily-RU 8 46 74 .383
7. HERBST, Ashley-LOU 7 40 66 .377
8. MARVINE, Haley-CIN 6 23 38 .377
9. WALSH, Jen-CIN 8 53 93 .363
10. BLACK, Barb-GU 8 28 60 .318
 
SAVES/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. TESTA, Brittney-UCONN 8 70 8.75
2. HOGAN, Liz-SU 8 63 7.88
3. HILLING, Ellie-ND 8 57 7.12
4. STOOTHOFF, Kerry-LOY 8 54 6.75
5. WALSH, Jen-CIN 8 53 6.62
6. KALATA, Lily-RU 8 46 5.75
7. HERBST, Ashley-LOU 7 40 5.71
8. HIRSCHFELD, Amanda-VU 8 42 5.25
9. MARVINE, Haley-CIN 6 23 3.83
10. BLACK, Barb-GU 8 28 3.50
 
SHUTOUTS/GAME GP Shutouts Sho/G
 
FREE-POSITION GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. GAVIN, Grace-LOY 8 9 1.12
2. LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 8 7 0.88
3. BLANEY, Shaylyn-ND 8 5 0.62
LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 8 5 0.62
FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 8 5 0.62
STEINBER, Ali-RU 8 5 0.62
FRANKLIN, Hannah-GU 8 5 0.62
ANDERSON, Kristen-RU 8 5 0.62
 
Team Identification Team ID
Cincinnati CIN
Connecticut UCONN
Georgetown GU
Louisville LOU
Loyola LOY
Notre Dame ND
Rutgers RU
Syracuse SU
Villanova VU